Re-presentation. Au fil du stauk disponbile.

Stauk a écrit:

- Peut t'on discuter de tout ?
- Oui, mais pas avec n'importe qui

Ah ben d'accord, mais ça veut dire quoi ?

- Peut t'on discuter de tout ?
- Oui, mais pas dans n'importe quelle situation

Ca me semble mieux comme formule, il y a moins ce coté accusateur du style "oui mais toi t'es trop con pour que je cherche à rigoler avec toi." Désormais ce n'est pas toi, c'est pas lui, c'est pas elle, c'est la situation. Je pense que ça posera moins de problème. C'est plus saint quoi.



Quid de la situation donc, celle où l'on est libre, celle où on peut dire, celle où on peut rire ?

Stauk a écrit:Je suis passé ce jour au forum des associations.
Jeudi : tennis, (fin 22h30), 500 euros l'année.
lundi, vendredi : tir à l'arc (250 euros l'année)
mardi : chorale (150 euros l'année)

Spoiler:

Pola a écrit:Mystère, tu peux me rappeler le son de la flûte à bec ?

Pola a écrit:Vous n'êtes pas sympa, j'ai pas de flûte à la maison

Numero6 a écrit:

Pola a écrit:Vous n'êtes pas sympa, j'ai pas de flûte à la maison

On avait cru comprendre, oui.

Pola a écrit:Il sait ce qu'il veut

One of the methods they used for doing this was to give the unwanted students a
diferent set of problems on their oral exam.  I was told that these problems were
carefully designed to have elementary solutions (so that the Department could
avoid  scandals)  that  were  nearly  impossible  to find.   Any  student  who  failed
to answer could easily be rejected,  so this system was an effective method of
controlling admissions.

Vladimir Voevodsky, 1966 — 2017 a écrit:
On the other hand, seeing the trends in the development of mathematics as a science, I realized that the time is coming when the proof of yet another conjecture won’t have much of an effect. I realized that mathematics is on the verge of a crisis, or rather, two crises.

The first is connected with the separation of “pure” and applied mathematics. It is clear that sooner or later there will be a question about why society should pay money to people who are engaged in things that do not have any practical applications.

The second, less obvious, is connected with the complication of pure mathematics, which leads to the fact that, sooner or later, the articles will become too complicated for detailed verification and the process of accumulating undetected errors will begin. And since mathematics is a very deep science, in the sense that the results of one article usually depend on the results of many and many previous articles, this accumulation of errors for mathematics is very dangerous.

So, I decided, you need to try to do something that will help prevent these crises.

Still, it is extremely difficult to accept that mathematics is in need of a completely new foundation. Even many of the people who are directly connected with the advances in homotopy type theory are struggling with this idea. There is a good reason: the existing foundations of mathematics—ZFC and category theory—have been very successful. Overcoming the appeal of category theory as a candidate for new foundations of mathematics was for me personally the most challenging.

Spoiler:

We focus on organizing computational principles that govern information processing in biology, at all levels. To this end, we employ and develop methods that stem from statistical physics, information theory and computational learning theory, to analyze biological data and develop biologically inspired algorithms that can account for the observed performance of biological systems.